Happy Valentine’s Day my Three Star Jewel: Chelsea legend Didier Drogba shares emotional post on instagram

With a new disciplinary low, a Chelsea player humiliates both himself and his boss

Last week, Nicolas Jackson was substituted off after 79 minutes of play against Crystal Palace. He put in a lot of effort as usual, but not much came of it. He was given a booking for running onto the field from the sidelines after Chelsea won the game in the closing moments. He is currently one caution away from receiving his tenth, which will result in a two-game suspension. It’s a good thing we won the game because if we hadn’t, it would have been the most embarrassing moment of a season that is already noteworthy for how terrible our discipline has been in situations like this. As it happened, we can laugh it off a bit because it was a victory. However, considering that manager Mauricio Pochettino has previously acknowledged that he has talked to Jackson extensively about these matters, it is completely disgraceful to receive your ninth (and remember, we’re not yet halfway through February) booking of the season for the most foolish and preventable reason. Although we adore Nicolas and think he may be a fantastic player for us, it seems unlikely that he will stick around on our team for very long unless he resolves this.

According to a former striker, Pochettino’s choice rendered the Man City goal “inevitable.

Gаry Lineker ԀiscusseԀ tҺe tҺrilling CҺelseа vs. Mаn City mаtcҺ оn SаturԀаy nigҺt оn tҺe Rest Is Fооtbаll pоԀcаst оn MоnԀаy. One of Mauricio Pochettino’s moves, to take Cole Palmer off the field after he had been playing on the wing for the first hour, was criticized by him. Trevoh Chalobah, a defender, took his place, and as the game progressed, the Blues sat deeper and deeper. “I was shocked beyond belief when Pochettino substituted Cole Palmer for a defender because they were having trouble getting out of a situation and he was the only player who could hold the ball and keep them in it. At that point, they were kind of even deeper, weren’t they? And they were almost certain to win, and in the end, they had the opportunity to pinch it. Although it’s simple to conclude that it was a bad choice, there are a number of extenuating factors. Chelsea required adjustments as they were worn out in the latter half of the match after giving it their all in the intense first hour. We were also better able to cover the pitch’s width after switching to a back three. We can all agree that we ought to have kept one guy on the field who could serve as an outlet, even if Palmer had to be substituted out. It ultimately cost us since Christopher Nkunku wasn’t capable of handling it on his own.